<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Generalist vs. Specialist, Part Two: FREE Webinar September 17th!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wellfedwriter.com/blog/generalist-vs-specialist-part-two-free-webinar-september-17th/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wellfedwriter.com/blog/generalist-vs-specialist-part-two-free-webinar-september-17th</link>
	<description>Income-boosting resources for commercial writers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 03:48:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Katherine Andes</title>
		<link>http://www.wellfedwriter.com/blog/generalist-vs-specialist-part-two-free-webinar-september-17th/comment-page-1#comment-1793</link>
		<dc:creator>Katherine Andes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wellfedwriter.com/blog/?p=103#comment-1793</guid>
		<description>Hi All, I missed the debate. Is it available for download? So far I&#039;m playing both sides of the fence in terms of arenas in which I work. I simply state that I work &quot;especially in the field of ...&quot; That seems to work well for attracting those clients, yet leaves the door open for others. Right now I&#039;m working in a field I never dreamed I could write for, and it quite enjoyable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi All, I missed the debate. Is it available for download? So far I&#8217;m playing both sides of the fence in terms of arenas in which I work. I simply state that I work &#8220;especially in the field of &#8230;&#8221; That seems to work well for attracting those clients, yet leaves the door open for others. Right now I&#8217;m working in a field I never dreamed I could write for, and it quite enjoyable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devon Ellington</title>
		<link>http://www.wellfedwriter.com/blog/generalist-vs-specialist-part-two-free-webinar-september-17th/comment-page-1#comment-1792</link>
		<dc:creator>Devon Ellington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 12:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wellfedwriter.com/blog/?p=103#comment-1792</guid>
		<description>Sorry I missed it -- I was in Prague.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry I missed it &#8212; I was in Prague.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mele Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.wellfedwriter.com/blog/generalist-vs-specialist-part-two-free-webinar-september-17th/comment-page-1#comment-1788</link>
		<dc:creator>Mele Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 00:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wellfedwriter.com/blog/?p=103#comment-1788</guid>
		<description>Loved it, Peter! Oh, and thanks for quoting me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loved it, Peter! Oh, and thanks for quoting me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael D. Scully</title>
		<link>http://www.wellfedwriter.com/blog/generalist-vs-specialist-part-two-free-webinar-september-17th/comment-page-1#comment-1787</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael D. Scully</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 23:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wellfedwriter.com/blog/?p=103#comment-1787</guid>
		<description>Thank you Peter. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Peter. <img src='http://www.wellfedwriter.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Bowerman</title>
		<link>http://www.wellfedwriter.com/blog/generalist-vs-specialist-part-two-free-webinar-september-17th/comment-page-1#comment-1786</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Bowerman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 21:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wellfedwriter.com/blog/?p=103#comment-1786</guid>
		<description>Michael, I just fixed your original comment and was about to delete your correction comment, but then realized there were a few follow-on comments to THAT! So, I left them all in... ;) 

I&#039;m with you 100% and think I drove that home pretty well in the debate. It should never be about the money, but about enjoying what you&#039;re doing. If you&#039;re not, you really are little better than a salaried employee in cubicle hell.. 

PB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael, I just fixed your original comment and was about to delete your correction comment, but then realized there were a few follow-on comments to THAT! So, I left them all in&#8230; <img src='http://www.wellfedwriter.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m with you 100% and think I drove that home pretty well in the debate. It should never be about the money, but about enjoying what you&#8217;re doing. If you&#8217;re not, you really are little better than a salaried employee in cubicle hell.. </p>
<p>PB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael D. Scully</title>
		<link>http://www.wellfedwriter.com/blog/generalist-vs-specialist-part-two-free-webinar-september-17th/comment-page-1#comment-1785</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael D. Scully</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 20:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wellfedwriter.com/blog/?p=103#comment-1785</guid>
		<description>And who says copywriters disparAHge grammar?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And who says copywriters disparAHge grammar?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan McCarthy</title>
		<link>http://www.wellfedwriter.com/blog/generalist-vs-specialist-part-two-free-webinar-september-17th/comment-page-1#comment-1784</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan McCarthy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 20:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wellfedwriter.com/blog/?p=103#comment-1784</guid>
		<description>You might be a copywriter if...

...your second comment on a blog apologizes for a grammatical error in the first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might be a copywriter if&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;your second comment on a blog apologizes for a grammatical error in the first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael D. Scully</title>
		<link>http://www.wellfedwriter.com/blog/generalist-vs-specialist-part-two-free-webinar-september-17th/comment-page-1#comment-1783</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael D. Scully</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 19:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wellfedwriter.com/blog/?p=103#comment-1783</guid>
		<description>&quot;...in turn from the point of view from two people who done quite well...&quot;

Ah, I meant...

&quot;from two people who HAVE done quite well.&quot;



Sorry about that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;in turn from the point of view from two people who done quite well&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Ah, I meant&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;from two people who HAVE done quite well.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sorry about that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael D. Scully</title>
		<link>http://www.wellfedwriter.com/blog/generalist-vs-specialist-part-two-free-webinar-september-17th/comment-page-1#comment-1782</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael D. Scully</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 19:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wellfedwriter.com/blog/?p=103#comment-1782</guid>
		<description>Dan,

I don&#039;t know whether your &quot;takeaway&quot; conclusion contradicts the point of the debate at all.  The point of the debate, it seems to me, was simply to address the question, in turn from the point of view from two people who have done quite well, each in a different way.

My perception is that the bottom line (if there was any) was this:

&quot;You should *consider* being a generalist IF...&quot;

~and~

&quot;You should *consider* specializing IF...&quot;

Of course, that sounds a lot like: 

&quot;You *might* be a redneck IF...&quot;

But never mind that. ;-)

I trained as an E-Myth coach some time ago.  The first thing I learned -- and anyone who really read the book would have gotten this also -- is that the purpose of your business is to serve and support your life.  Your business exists to serve you, not the other way around. Of course, your business succeeds by serving other people, so there is a bit of a paradox.

It comes down to your (implicit) question: What gets you out of bed in the morning?  There has to be something in the &quot;doing&quot; itself that excites you.  There&#039;s no way around it for us, since a freelance writing business isn&#039;t something you can build so that it can operate without you having to &quot;work IN it&quot; every day.  (I mean, you could do that, but then you wouldn&#039;t be a writer, you&#039;d be a business builder.  And most of us here want to write.)

There are trade-offs.  There are advantages to each, and each one of us has to choose.  So I think your &quot;bottom line&quot; is absolutely correct.

I see no contradiction.

Alas, your Shakespearean allusion is dead-on (to use another British expression).  Alas, there&#039;s the rub.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know whether your &#8220;takeaway&#8221; conclusion contradicts the point of the debate at all.  The point of the debate, it seems to me, was simply to address the question, in turn from the point of view from two people who have done quite well, each in a different way.</p>
<p>My perception is that the bottom line (if there was any) was this:</p>
<p>&#8220;You should *consider* being a generalist IF&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>~and~</p>
<p>&#8220;You should *consider* specializing IF&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Of course, that sounds a lot like: </p>
<p>&#8220;You *might* be a redneck IF&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>But never mind that. <img src='http://www.wellfedwriter.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I trained as an E-Myth coach some time ago.  The first thing I learned &#8212; and anyone who really read the book would have gotten this also &#8212; is that the purpose of your business is to serve and support your life.  Your business exists to serve you, not the other way around. Of course, your business succeeds by serving other people, so there is a bit of a paradox.</p>
<p>It comes down to your (implicit) question: What gets you out of bed in the morning?  There has to be something in the &#8220;doing&#8221; itself that excites you.  There&#8217;s no way around it for us, since a freelance writing business isn&#8217;t something you can build so that it can operate without you having to &#8220;work IN it&#8221; every day.  (I mean, you could do that, but then you wouldn&#8217;t be a writer, you&#8217;d be a business builder.  And most of us here want to write.)</p>
<p>There are trade-offs.  There are advantages to each, and each one of us has to choose.  So I think your &#8220;bottom line&#8221; is absolutely correct.</p>
<p>I see no contradiction.</p>
<p>Alas, your Shakespearean allusion is dead-on (to use another British expression).  Alas, there&#8217;s the rub.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan McCarthy</title>
		<link>http://www.wellfedwriter.com/blog/generalist-vs-specialist-part-two-free-webinar-september-17th/comment-page-1#comment-1781</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan McCarthy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wellfedwriter.com/blog/?p=103#comment-1781</guid>
		<description>Writing after the event here... A good debate all around, and great questions. My takeaway (more inferred, than heard), is that choosing to be generalist vs specialist should be a personal choice, not a marketing strategy. 

That conclusion contradicts the point of the debate a bit. But to casually drop a Shakespeare allusion, neither path is better except thinking makes it so. What matters is that you&#039;re passionate and committed to the path you choose because, brother, writing for money ain&#039;t always easy, and writing about something in which you lack interest is a short path to failure.

Bottom line (and, I&#039;m sure, not uncoincidentally the underlying point of the Copywriting Success Summit): The best approach is to first decide what path will get you out of bed in the morning, and then learn which marketing tools are more appropriate to the path you&#039;ve chosen. (WARNING - Shameless Plug: I just blogged about this)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Writing after the event here&#8230; A good debate all around, and great questions. My takeaway (more inferred, than heard), is that choosing to be generalist vs specialist should be a personal choice, not a marketing strategy. </p>
<p>That conclusion contradicts the point of the debate a bit. But to casually drop a Shakespeare allusion, neither path is better except thinking makes it so. What matters is that you&#8217;re passionate and committed to the path you choose because, brother, writing for money ain&#8217;t always easy, and writing about something in which you lack interest is a short path to failure.</p>
<p>Bottom line (and, I&#8217;m sure, not uncoincidentally the underlying point of the Copywriting Success Summit): The best approach is to first decide what path will get you out of bed in the morning, and then learn which marketing tools are more appropriate to the path you&#8217;ve chosen. (WARNING &#8211; Shameless Plug: I just blogged about this)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

